I’ve been wondering about a more effective way to communicate the bitcoin concept and why does it matter. Typically I come across two kind of people.
- Like-minded people who feel offended for not being told about bitcoin earlier, or
- The majority that tolerates me, and my unexplainable excited exposition, to various degrees.
Even if people go like “Oh, that’s cool!” there’s no real incentive for them to go out of their way and try new stuff. To literally go play with money. This topic has been discussed before but typically it’s from a monetary incentive perspective where we try to get those greedy bastards to jump through all the hoops because of the discount they have. The typical case here is Purse.io. The complementary approach I’m thinking is a little different.
People have evolved with the sense of surprise. It has helped us survive in a changing environment by making us more alert to things that don’t go exactly how we expect. When surprised, someone might flee or just get really alert to the situation. So maybe this phenomenon can be used to stimulate people to learn more about bitcoin, or money in general.
There are many surprising aspects with fiat money. In particular, people assume a lot of things that are not true with the USD or EUR but are true with bitcoin.
Certain facts about money and banks have always circulated around as trivia. But maybe they are quire important and it’s possible to make simple questions, based on them, that are extremely surprising for many people. The typical ones that occur to me are bellow.
If it was really your property there would not be legislation making it illegal to destroy it or the need to distinguish money from other property in laws regarding theft. All bills and coins are government property and the destruction of all government property, by citizens, is typically illegal. This means the government is extremely gracious to let us all use their money for our daily affairs.
Queue South Parks’ “And it’s GONE!” scene.
The money was not yours to start with. When you deposit 1000 into a bank account you give the money to the bank and become a creditor. Everything goes well until the bank goes bankrupt which means it can’t pay what it owes you. You can’t demand your money back because it’s not your money so you have to get in line with all the other creditors.
If you’re European you may have heard of the deposit insurance scheme that guarantees deposits up to €100,000. If it was really your money there would be no need for that insurance.
It’s magic! Actually it’s fractional reserve banking but it could as well be magic because money is made out of thin air.
Banks are only required to keep a fraction – like 10% – of the money people deposit. The rest they can give to other people in loans. From your 1000 deposit the bank can give a loan of 900 to another person. That person can take those 900 and make a new deposit, the new deposit be used to create a new loan of 810, and so on. At the end of it, if everyone withdrew the deposited money, there would be 10,000 available. This is an exaggeration of what happens in reality but it happens.
These are the most basic ones. Many people will not act on them. Some people might just want to disprove these things and go search for it. Others might feel they are less safe than they thought and go search for solutions. All of those are a good outcome, in my book.
What do you think? Can these kind of questions stimulate people to be more curious about the absolute insanities of some parts of the financial system? Do you know other questions that spark the same sense of surprise? Tell about it in the comments.